IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
GREGG QUAGLIANO, )
)
Plaintiff, )
v. )
)
TOWNHOUSE BOOKS, LTD. d/b/a )
TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ, )
) No.: 05 LK 308
Defendants,
)
)
v. )
)
SYSCO FOODS SERVICES, INC., )
)
Intervenor. )
MOTION OF TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ (TOWNHOUSE BOOKS, LTD.)
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NOW
COMES the Defendant, TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ (TOWNHOUSE BOOKS, LTD.)
(hereinafter “TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ”), by and
through its attorney, LAW OFFICE LOWELL D. SNORF, III, and move this
Honorable Court pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1005(b) for summary judgment as to the
following issues of Count I of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint at Law:
1.
PLAINTIFF DELIBERATELY ASSUMED THE RISK OF HARM BY
REPEATEDLY STEPPING ON THE THRESHOLD, KNOWING SAME TO BE HAZARDOUS
2.
ALTERNATIVELY, PLAINTIFF HAS NOT ESTABLISHED TOWNHOUSE
HAD REASONABLE NOTICE OF ANY ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE THRESHOLD
STEP OR THAT ANY ALLEGED DEFECT CREATED AN
UNREASONABLE
RISK OF HARM TO PLAINTIFF
I.
BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS TO DATE
On
II.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On
Before
delivering the product, GREGG QUAGLIANO parked the SYSCO 24 foot delivery truck
facing west on Cedar (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 18).
Using a two-wheeled aluminum cart, he was to deliver food product with a
combined weight of 587 lbs. (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 21).
It was a sunny and clear day (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition
of Gregg Quagliano, p. 17). Because GREGG QUAGLIANO had never before
delivered to TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ, he found café manager, Doug Bella, to learn where
to deliver the product (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 25).
QUAGLIANO says he pointed out to café manager, Doug Bella, the threshold
had a crack in it and that the walkway bricks were uneven (see Exhibit “5,”
discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 25-29).
Despite
QUAGLIANO’S knowledge of the threshold crack, QUAGLIANO made his first
delivery, and product fell off the cart because of uneven bricks (see Exhibit
“5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 30,
31). QUAGLIANO then decided not to walk
over the bricks going to the step.
Instead, he walked the product down the street to the corner, which was
a cement sidewalk with a smooth uniform surface (see Exhibit “5,” discovery
deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 31, 32).
QUAGLIANO
made a second delivery of food product without incident (see Exhibit “5,”
discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 33). QUAGLIANO made a third delivery probably
without incident, but he does not know if the threshold broke beneath him on
the third or fourth delivery (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 34).
QUAGLIANO said he had the cart in front of him, stepped backward with
his left foot on the threshold, pulled the cart toward him, and the threshold
broke under his left foot (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 36-37; including deposition exhibit “4,”
August 19, 2004 accident statement of Gregg Quagliano).
QUAGLIANO
says he told SYSCO safety manager, Michael R. Altendorf,
the threshold was cracked before he got there (see Exhibit “5,” discovery
deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 42). QUAGLIANO says he made a report to SYSCO that
the threshold was cracked before the delivery (see Exhibit “5,” discovery
deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 34, 42).
On
On
ARGUMENT
1.
PLAINTIFF DELIBERATELY ASSUMED THE RISK OF HARM BY
REPEATEDLY STEPPING ON THE THRESHOLD, KNOWING SAME TO BE HAZARDOUS
When
QUAGLIANO arrived at TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ, he said the step was cracked, but intact
(see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano,
p. 35). QUAGLIANO testified although he recognized the
step was cracked, he pulled his loaded cart over the step anyway (see Exhibit
“5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p.
24). QUAGLIANO immediately realized the
step was cracked and the bricks uneven, which he pointed out to Doug Bella (see
Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano,
p. 26-29, 30). After the first instance
of product falling off the cart due to uneven bricks, QUAGLIANO, knew to avoid
the step and bricks by taking an alternative route, walking the product down
the street to the corner coming down the smooth sidewalk (see Exhibit “5,”
discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 31). Despite his prior understanding of the
cracked step and uneven bricks, QUAGLIANO made a second delivery pulling the
cart over the threshold which was without incident (see Exhibit “5,” discovery
deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 34). QUAGLIANO made one or two additional
deliveries, pulling his loaded cart while stepping on a threshold he says was
cracked. It was during the third or fourth delivery QUAGLIANO pulled the loaded
cart toward him, stepping on the threshold which broke beneath him (see Exhibit “5,”
discovery deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p.
35-36).
However,
under the deliberate encounter exception, a plaintiff who voluntarily assumes a
risk of harm arising from defendant’s negligent conduct cannot recover for such
harm. In both Hastings v. Exline, 326 Ill.App.3d 172, 760 N.E.2d 993(4th
Dist., 2001) and Bonavia
v. Rockford Flotilla, 348 Ill.App.3d 286, 808 N.E.2d 1131 (2nd
Dist., 2004), the appellate courts affirmed the trial court’s summary judgment
for defendants, finding plaintiff knew of the peril and voluntarily accepted
the risk anyway. As stated in Bonavia v. Rockford Flotilla:
“Generally, a plaintiff who voluntarily assumes a risk
of harm arising from a defendant’s negligent conduct cannot recover **1138
***850 for such harm. Restatement
(Second) of Torts § 496A (1965).
A plaintiff voluntarily assumes a known risk when he fails to leave or
chooses to remain in the area of risk under circumstances manifesting his
willingness to accept it.” 808 N.E.2d at 1136.
QUAGLIANO realized the step was
cracked and discussed the step crack with Doug Bella (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of
Gregg Quagliano, p. 28). QUAGLIANO claims he had a two minute
conversation with Doug Bella, discussing the general condition of the
walkway (see Exhibit “5,” discovery
deposition of Gregg Quagliano, p. 29). In fact, QUAGLIANO told Doug Bella both the
bricks and steps were hazardous (see Exhibit “5,” discovery deposition of
Gregg Quagliano, p. 29-30). Nevertheless, QUAGLIANO made three or four
deliveries over an area he knew was hazardous, breaking the threshold on his
third or fourth delivery. QUAGLIANO
recognized the hazard of the cracked threshold, but repeatedly traversed upon
the threshold with a loaded delivery cart until it broke.
WHEREFORE,
as there is no triable issue of fact sustaining the
allegations within Count I of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint at Law against Defendant,
TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ (TOWNHOUSE BOOKS, LTD.), Defendant respectfully requests this
Honorable Court enter a summary judgment in favor of TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ (TOWNHOUSE BOOKS,
LTD.).
ARGUMENT
2.
ALTERNATIVELY, PLAINTIFF HAS NOT ESTABLISHED TOWNHOUSE
HAD REASONABLE NOTICE OF ANY ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE THRESHOLD
STEP OR THAT ANY ALLEGED DEFECT CREATED AN
UNREASONABLE
RISK
OF HARM TO PLAINTIFF
QUAGLIANO
is relying on proof that TOWNHOUSE had constructive notice of a cracked
threshold and the condition existed for a sufficient time, so that TOWNHOUSE
could have discovered the hazard. Smolek v. K.W. Landscaping, 266 Ill.App.3d 226, 639 N.E.2d
974 (2nd Dist., 1994).
According
to Michael R. Altendorf, on
On
6. State in
detail what caused your fall.
ANSWER: Objection as the Interrogatory calls for a
narrative response. Without waiving said objection, see plaintiffs Complaint at
Law- defective/broken walkway/step.
7. State any
and all defects or conditions in the premises you claim caused your fall.
ANSWER: Objection
as the Interrogatory calls for a narrative response. Without waiving said
objection, see plaintiffs Complaint at Law-defective/broken walkway/step.
8. If you are
claiming that a condition of the sidewalk/walkway caused your fall, how long had
the defect existed on the sidewalk/walkway before you fell?
ANSWER: Unknown at
this time. Investigation continues.
9. When did
you first become aware of each defect on the sidewalk/walkway?
ANSWER: At the time
of the occurrence.
10. When did Defendant
become aware of the defect on the sidewalk/walkway?
ANSWER: Unknown at this time. Investigation
continues.
11. Who created
the dangerous condition on the sidewalk/walkway?
ANSWER: Unknown
at this time. Investigation continues.
QUAGLIANO
was deposed on
Plaintiff
has not established through any witness how long the “crack” existed or how
anyone at TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ can be charged with knowledge of its existence.
WHEREFORE,
as there is no triable issue of fact sustaining the
allegations within Count I of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint at Law against
Defendant, TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ (TOWNHOUSE BOOKS, LTD.), Defendant respectfully
requests this Honorable Court enter a summary judgment in favor of TOWNHOUSE CAFÉ
(TOWNHOUSE BOOKS, LTD.).
LAW OFFICES OF LOWELL D. SNORF, III Respectfully submitted,
Telephone: (312) 726-8961 Lowell
D. Snorf, III
ATT # 71148